Equivalent $SU(3)_f$ approaches for two-body anti-triplet charmed baryon decays
Y.K. Hsiao, Y.L. Wang, H.J. Zhao

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates the equivalence of two $SU(3)_f$ symmetry approaches in analyzing two-body anti-triplet charmed baryon decays, providing insights into decay mechanisms and predicting branching fractions for future experimental verification.
Contribution
It establishes the theoretical equivalence between the irreducible $SU(3)_f$ approach and the topological-diagram approach for charmed baryon decays, and relates specific decay topologies to experimental data.
Findings
Identifies a key $W$-boson exchange topology $E_M$ influencing certain decay modes.
Explains the large difference in branching ratios of $ o n \pi^+$ and $ o p \pi^0$ decays.
Predicts branching fractions for various decays under $SU(3)_f$ symmetry for future tests.
Abstract
For the two-body decays, where denotes the anti-triplet charm baryon and the octet baryon (meson), there exist two theoretical studies based on the flavor [] symmetry. One is the irreducible approach (IRA). In the irreducible representation, the effective Hamiltonian related to the initial and final states forms the amplitudes for . The other is the topological-diagram approach (TDA), where the -boson emission and -boson exchange topologies are drawn and parameterized for the decays. As required by the group theoretical consideration, we present the same number of the IRA and TDA amplitudes. We can hence relate the two kinds of the amplitudes, and demonstrate the equivalence of the two approaches. We find a specific -boson exchange topology only contributing to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
