The accidental flatness constraint does not mean a wrong classical limit
Jonathan Engle, Carlo Rovelli

TL;DR
This paper explains why the accidental flatness constraint in covariant loop quantum gravity is not problematic, by comparing it to similar constraints in simple systems' transition amplitudes.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the flatness constraint is harmless by illustrating its analogy with accidental constraints in simpler systems.
Findings
The flatness constraint appears in certain quantum gravity limits.
Analogous constraints occur in simple systems' transition amplitudes.
The constraint does not imply a fundamental inconsistency.
Abstract
We shed some light on the reason why the accidental flatness constraint appears in certain limits of the amplitudes of covariant loop quantum gravity. We show why this constraint is harmless, by displaying how analogous accidental constraints appear in transition amplitudes of simple systems, when certain limits are considered.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics · Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
