Comment on Kuwahara et al., Intensity Interference in a Coherent Spin-Polarized Electron Beam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 125501 (2021)
Herman Batelaan, Sam Keramati, T. J. Gay

TL;DR
This paper critically examines Kuwahara et al.'s claim of observing electron antibunching, suggesting that the observed effects could be due to polarization-dependent emission rates rather than quantum interference.
Contribution
It provides an alternative explanation for the observed phenomena, challenging the interpretation of the original experiment as evidence of quantum interference effects.
Findings
The observed antibunching dip may be explained by polarization-dependent emission rates.
Strain-induced linear dichroism could account for the reported effects.
The paper questions the original interpretation of the experimental results.
Abstract
The claim that Kuwahara et al. [1] have reported the observation of a Hanbury Brown-Twiss electron antibunching dip (their Fig. 3) could possibly be explained as an electron source emission rate dependency on the light polarization. Strain on their GaAs/GaAsP sample is uniaxial, and one would expect a linear dichroism in the photoemission possibly as large as 15% [7] - much larger than the 0.1% reported effect. The same concern exist for circular polarized light.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates · Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research · Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
