Computational self-testing for entangled magic states
Akihiro Mizutani, Yuki Takeuchi, Ryo Hiromasa, Yusuke Aikawa,, Seiichiro Tani

TL;DR
This paper extends the concept of computational self-testing to non-stabilizer states, specifically magic states for quantum gates, demonstrating that some can be self-tested while others cannot, impacting quantum verification methods.
Contribution
It introduces a method to self-test certain non-stabilizer magic states, notably for the CCZ gate, advancing quantum device verification beyond stabilizer states.
Findings
CCZ magic state can be self-tested.
T gate magic state cannot be self-tested.
Applicable to proofs of quantumness for state verification.
Abstract
In the seminal paper [Metger and Vidick, Quantum '21], they proposed a computational self-testing protocol for Bell states in a single quantum device. Their protocol relies on the fact that the target states are stabilizer states, and hence it is highly non-trivial to reveal whether the other class of quantum states, non-stabilizer states, can be self-tested within their framework. Among non-stabilizer states, magic states are indispensable resources for universal quantum computation. In this letter, we show that a magic state for the CCZ gate can be self-tested while that for the T gate cannot. Our result is applicable to a proof of quantumness, where we can classically verify whether a quantum device generates a quantum state having non-zero magic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Quantum Information and Cryptography
