K2-79b and K2-222b: Mass measurements of two small exoplanets with periods beyond 10 days that overlap with periodic magnetic activity signals
Chantanelle Nava, Mercedes L\'opez-Morales, Annelies Mortier, Li Zeng,, Helen A. C. Giles, Allyson Bieryla, Andrew Vanderburg, Lars A. Buchhave,, Ennio Poretti, Steven H. Saar, Xavier Dumusque, David W. Latham, David, Charbonneau, Mario Damasso, Aldo S. Bonomo, Christophe Lovis

TL;DR
This paper develops a method to accurately measure the masses of two small exoplanets with orbital periods near stellar activity signals, confirming their masses and compositions despite interference.
Contribution
It introduces a technique to mitigate stellar activity interference in radial velocity data, enabling precise mass measurements of exoplanets with periods overlapping stellar signals.
Findings
Confirmed masses: 11.8 ± 3.6 M_Earth for K2-79b and 8.0 ± 1.8 M_Earth for K2-222b.
K2-79b is a highly irradiated Uranus-analog; K2-222b contains significant water ice.
Detected a candidate second companion at 147.5 days orbiting K2-222.
Abstract
We present mass and radius measurements of K2-79b and K2-222b, two transiting exoplanets orbiting active G-type stars. Their respective 10.99d and 15.39d orbital periods fall near periods of signals induced by stellar magnetic activity. The two signals might therefore interfere and lead to an inaccurate estimate of exoplanet mass. We present a method to mitigate these effects when radial velocity and activity indicator observations are available over multiple observing seasons and the orbital period of the exoplanet is known. We perform correlation and periodogram analyses on sub-sets composed of each target's two observing seasons, in addition to the full data sets. For both targets, these analyses reveal an optimal season with little to no interference at the orbital period of the known exoplanet. We make a confident mass detection of each exoplanet by confirming agreement between…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
