TL;DR
This paper investigates how measurements of black hole shadows can differentiate general relativity from alternative gravity theories, emphasizing the importance of accurate astrophysical models for such tests.
Contribution
It introduces a spherical accretion model in various gravity theories and analyzes the potential to distinguish these theories using shadow measurements.
Findings
Corrections from gravity modifications are smaller than impact parameter effects.
Astrophysical uncertainties dominate the shadow measurement errors.
Accurate astrophysical modeling enables testing gravity theories with shadow data.
Abstract
The groundbreaking image of the black hole at the center of the M87 galaxy has raised questions at the intersection of observational astronomy and black hole physics. How well can the radius of a black hole shadow can be measured, and can this measurement be used to distinguish general relativity from other theories of gravity? We explore these questions using a simple spherical flow model in general relativity, scalar Gauss--Bonnet gravity, and the Rezzolla and Zhidenko parameterized metric. We assume an optically thin plasma with power-law emissivity in radius. Along the way we present a generalized Bondi flow as well as a piecewise-analytic model for the brightness profile of a cold inflow. We use the second moment of a synthetic image as a proxy for EHT observables and compute the ratio of the second moment to the radius of the black hole shadow. We show that corrections to this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
