Porosities of the sets of attractors
Pawe{\l} Klinga, Adam Kwela

TL;DR
This paper investigates the porosity properties of attractor sets for iterated function systems and weak iterated function systems on [0,1], revealing that the set of attractors for standard systems is not strongly porous and that the difference with weak attractors is dense.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the family of attractors for standard IFSs is not $ ext{sigma}$-strongly porous and that weak attractors outside this family are dense in the hyperspace.
Findings
$A[0,1]$ is not $ ext{sigma}$-strongly porous.
$A_w[0,1]ackslash A[0,1]$ is dense in $K([0,1])$.
Both sets are meager in the hyperspace.
Abstract
This paper is another attempt to measure the difference between the family of attractors for iterated function systems acting on and a broader family, the set of attractors for weak iterated function systems acting on . It is known that both and are meager subsets of the hyperspace (of all compact subsets of equipped in the Hausdorff metric). Actually, is even -lower porous while the question about -lower porosity of is still open. We prove that is not -strongly porous in . Moreover, we show that is dense in .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Caveolin-1 and cellular processes
