Borel complexity of the family of attractors for weak IFSs
Pawe{\l} Klinga, Adam Kwela

TL;DR
This paper investigates the Borel complexity of the set of attractors for weak iterated function systems, revealing it is highly complex and differs significantly from classical IFS attractors, especially in one dimension.
Contribution
It establishes the Borel complexity classification of weak IFS attractors, showing they are $G_{\delta ext{-}\sigma}$-hard and analytic in one dimension, highlighting their intricate topological nature.
Findings
wIFS$^d$ is $G_{ ext{ extdelta} ext{ extsigma}}$-hard in the hyperspace.
wIFS$^d$ is not $F_{ ext{ extsigma} ext{ extdelta}}$, unlike classical IFS attractors.
wIFS$^1$ is an analytic subset of the hyperspace.
Abstract
This paper is an attempt to measure the difference between the family of iterated function systems attractors and a broader family, the set of attractors for weak iterated function systems. We discuss Borel complexity of the set wIFS of attractors for weak iterated function systems acting on (as a subset of the hyperspace of all compact subsets of equipped in the Hausdorff metric). We prove that wIFS is -hard in , for all . In particular, wIFS is not (in contrast to the family IFS of attractors for classical iterated function systems acting on , which is ). Moreover, we show that in the one-dimensional case, wIFS is an analytic subset of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
