An Exchange-Based Diagnostic for Static Correlation
Jan M.L. Martin, Golokesh Santra, and Emmanouil Semidalas

TL;DR
This paper introduces a DFT-based diagnostic for static correlation that effectively measures the difference between DFT and HF exchange energies, providing a cost-effective way to assess static correlation importance.
Contribution
It presents a new, intuitive diagnostic based on exchange energy differences and analyzes the main factors explaining static correlation variation.
Findings
The diagnostic correlates well with existing measures of static correlation.
Principal component analysis reveals four main factors explaining variation.
The diagnostic is computationally efficient and intuitive.
Abstract
We propose here a DFT-based diagnostic for static correlation %TAEX[TPSS@HF - HF] which effectively measures how different the DFT and HF exchange energies for a given HF density are. This and %TAEcorr[TPSS] are two cost-effective a priori estimates for the adequacy of the importance of static correlation. %TAEX[TPSS@HF - HF] contains nearly the same information as the earlier A diagnostic, but may be more intuitive to understand. Principal component and variable clustering analysis of a large number of static correlation diagnostics reveals much of the variation is explained by just two components, and almost all of it by four; these are blocked by four variable clusters (single excitations; correlation entropy; double excitations; pragmatic energetics).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
