Detecting Whether a Stochastic Process is Finitely Expressed in a Basis
Neda Mohammadi, Victor M. Panaretos

TL;DR
This paper presents a hypothesis testing method to determine if a stochastic process's sample paths almost surely have a finite basis expansion, using finite, possibly noisy observations and combining classical irrationality tests with non-parametric covariance estimation.
Contribution
It introduces a novel testing scheme that guarantees finite decision errors asymptotically, enabling detection of finite versus infinite basis expansions in stochastic processes.
Findings
The scheme almost surely makes finitely many incorrect decisions.
It can handle noisy and discretely observed sample paths.
The approach combines Cover's irrationality test with covariance estimation.
Abstract
Is it possible to detect if the sample paths of a stochastic process almost surely admit a finite expansion with respect to some/any basis? The determination is to be made on the basis of a finite collection of discretely/noisily observed sample paths. We show that it is indeed possible to construct a hypothesis testing scheme that is almost surely guaranteed to make only finitely many incorrect decisions as more data are collected. Said differently, our scheme almost certainly detects whether the process has a finite or infinite basis expansion for all sufficiently large sample sizes. Our approach relies on Cover's classical test for the irrationality of a mean, combined with tools for the non-parametric estimation of covariance operators.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Statistical Process Monitoring · Statistical Methods and Inference
