Negative quasiprobabilities enhance phase estimation in quantum-optics experiment
Noah B. Lupu-Gladstein, Batuhan Y. Yilmaz, David R. M., Arvidsson-Shukur, Aharon Brodutch, Arthur O. T. Pang, Aephraim M. Steinberg,, Nicole Yunger Halpern

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates how negative quasiprobabilities, linked to noncommuting operators, can significantly enhance phase measurement precision in quantum optics through a novel filtering technique called partially postselected amplification (PPA).
Contribution
The authors establish a theoretical relationship between negative quasiprobabilities and metrological advantage, and experimentally validate PPA's ability to amplify phase information in optical measurements.
Findings
PPA amplifies phase information by over two orders of magnitude.
Systematic errors bound the practical advantage of PPA.
PPA mitigates noise and detector saturation challenges in phase measurements.
Abstract
Operator noncommutation, a hallmark of quantum theory, limits measurement precision, according to uncertainty principles. Wielded correctly, though, noncommutation can boost precision. A recent foundational result relates a metrological advantage with negative quasiprobabilities -- quantum extensions of probabilities -- engendered by noncommuting operators. We crystallize the relationship in an equation that we prove theoretically and observe experimentally. Our proof-of-principle optical experiment features a filtering technique that we term partially postselected amplification (PPA). Using PPA, we measure a waveplate's birefringent phase. PPA amplifies, by over two orders of magnitude, the information obtained about the phase per detected photon. In principle, PPA can boost the information obtained from the average filtered photon by an arbitrarily large factor. The filter's…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
