Dust destruction and survival in the Cassiopeia A reverse shock

TL;DR

This study measures dust destruction in the Cassiopeia A supernova remnant's reverse shock, revealing high destruction efficiency and implications for cosmic dust origins, with potential variations based on grain size.

Contribution

It provides the first detailed observational estimate of dust destruction efficiency in Cas A's reverse shock using an improved emission model.

Findings

Dust destruction efficiency is 74-98% in Cas A.

Final dust yield ranges from 0.05 to 0.30 solar masses.

Higher initial grain sizes could lead to greater dust retention.

Abstract

Core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) produce large ($\gtrsim 0.1 \, {\rm M}_\odot$) masses of dust, and are potentially the primary source of dust in the Universe, but much of this dust may be destroyed before reaching the interstellar medium. Cassiopeia A (Cas A) is the only supernova remnant where an observational measurement of the dust destruction efficiency in the reverse shock is possible at present. We determine the pre- and post-shock dust masses in Cas A using a substantially improved dust emission model. In our preferred models, the unshocked ejecta contains $0.6-0.8 \, {\rm M}_\odot$ of $0.1 \, {\rm \mu m}$ silicate grains, while the post-shock ejecta has $0.02-0.09 \, {\rm M}_\odot$ of $5-10 {\, {\rm nm}}$ grains in dense clumps, and $2 \times 10^{-3} \, {\rm M}_\odot$ of $0.1 \, {\rm \mu m}$ grains in the diffuse X-ray emitting shocked ejecta. The implied dust destruction efficiency is $74-94 \%$ in the clumps and $92-98 \%$ overall, giving Cas A a final dust yield of $0.05-0.30 \, {\rm M}_\odot$. If the unshocked ejecta grains are larger than $0.1 \, {\rm \mu m}$, the dust masses are higher, the destruction efficiencies are lower, and the final yield may exceed $0.5 \, {\rm M}_\odot$. As Cas A has a dense circumstellar environment and thus a much stronger reverse shock than is typical, the average dust destruction efficiency across all CCSNe is likely to be lower, and the average dust yield higher. This supports a mostly-stellar origin for the cosmic dust budget.