Limits on inference of gravitational entanglement
Yue Ma, Thomas Guff, Gavin Morley, Igor Pikovski, M. S. Kim

TL;DR
This paper critically examines proposed experiments to detect gravitationally induced quantum entanglement, showing that classical models can mimic the expected signatures, thus challenging the interpretation of such experiments as evidence of quantum gravity.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the key signatures of gravitational entanglement can be reproduced by semi-classical models, questioning the reliability of current experimental approaches.
Findings
Classical models can produce visibility collapses and revivals.
Non-classicality of the oscillator is limited unless near ground state.
Detecting entanglement requires verifying non-classicality, which is highly challenging.
Abstract
Combining gravity with quantum mechanics remains one of the biggest challenges of physics. In the past years, experiments with opto-mechanical systems have been proposed that may give indirect clues about the quantum nature of gravity. In a recent variation of such tests [D. Carney et al., Phys.Rev.X Quantum 2, 030330 (2021)], the authors propose to gravitationally entangle an atom interferometer with a mesoscopic oscillator. The interaction results in periodic drops and revivals of the interferometeric visibility, which under specific assumptions indicate the gravitational generation of entanglement. Here we study semi-classical models of the atom interferometer that can reproduce the same effect. We show that the core signature -- periodic collapses and revivals of the visibility -- can appear if the atom is subject to a random unitary channel, including the case where the oscillator…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
