Two-track depictions of Leibniz's fictions
Mikhail G. Katz, Karl Kuhlemann, David Sherry, Monica Ugaglia, Mark, van Atten

TL;DR
This paper explores Leibniz's perspective on imaginary roots, negatives, and infinitesimals, analyzing whether he considered them as mathematical entities or mere fictions, through a detailed review of current scholarship.
Contribution
It offers a new interpretation of Leibniz's views on mathematical fictions by critically examining contemporary scholarship and historical texts.
Findings
Leibniz viewed certain mathematical concepts as useful fictions.
Current scholarship presents diverse interpretations of Leibniz's stance.
The paper clarifies Leibniz's position on the ontological status of mathematical fictions.
Abstract
Leibniz described imaginary roots, negatives, and infinitesimals as useful fictions. But did he view such 'impossible' numbers as mathematical entities? Alice and Bob take on the labyrinth of the current Leibniz scholarship.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
