TL;DR
This paper introduces a new moment-matching metric for evaluating latent variable models, offering a faster and more stable alternative to likelihood-based metrics for model comparison and regularization.
Contribution
The authors propose a novel moment-matching metric based on matrix norms to assess and regularize latent variable models, addressing limitations of likelihood-based evaluation.
Findings
The new metric is faster to compute than sample-based methods.
It has lower variance compared to likelihood-based evaluation.
Demonstrated effectiveness in model comparison and regularization.
Abstract
It can be difficult to assess the quality of a fitted model when facing unsupervised learning problems. Latent variable models, such as variation autoencoders and Gaussian mixture models, are often trained with likelihood-based approaches. In scope of Goodhart's law, when a metric becomes a target it ceases to be a good metric and therefore we should not use likelihood to assess the quality of the fit of these models. The solution we propose is a new metric for model comparison or regularization that relies on moments. The concept is to study the difference between the data moments and the model moments using a matrix norm, such as the Frobenius norm. We show how to use this new metric for model comparison and then for regularization. It is common to draw samples from the fitted distribution when evaluating latent variable models and we show that our proposed metric is faster to compute…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
