Statistical Review of Animal trials -- A Guideline
Sophie K. Piper, Dario Zocholl, Ulf Toelch, Robert Roehle, Andrea, Stroux, Johanna H\"o{\ss}ler, Anne Kujawa, Frank Konietschke

TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the importance of statistical planning in animal trials, introduces a biometric form to standardize review processes, and aims to improve ethical and scientific quality in preclinical research.
Contribution
It develops a standardized biometric form for statistical planning in animal experiments, aiding compliance with ethical standards and improving research quality.
Findings
The biometric form is implemented by Berlin's animal welfare authority.
The form helps ensure statistical and ethical standards are met.
It promotes consistency and quality in animal trial reviews.
Abstract
Examinations of any experiment involving living organisms require justifications of the need and moral defensibleness of the study. Statistical planning, design and sample size calculation of the experiment are no less important review criteria than general medical and ethical points to consider. Errors made in the statistical planning and data evaluation phase can have severe consequences on both results and conclusions. They might proliferate and thus impact future trials-an unintended outcome of fundamental research with profound ethical consequences. Therefore, any trial must be efficient in both a medical and statistical way in answering the questions of interests to be considered as approvable. Unified statistical standards are currently missing for animal review boards in Germany. In order to accompany, we developed a biometric form to be filled and handed in with the proposal at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnimal testing and alternatives · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
