On the Possibility of an Artificial Origin for `Oumuamua
Abraham Loeb (Harvard)

TL;DR
This paper explores the unusual characteristics of `Oumuamua, considering the possibility of an artificial origin due to natural explanations' shortcomings, and discusses the Galileo Project's efforts to gather data for identification.
Contribution
It highlights the anomalies of `Oumuamua and argues for considering artificial origins, proposing future data collection through the Galileo Project.
Findings
Natural models have significant quantitative shortcomings.
Artificial origin remains a plausible hypothesis.
Galileo Project aims to collect data to determine `Oumuamua's nature.
Abstract
The first large interstellar object discovered near Earth, `Oumuamua, showed half a dozen anomalies relative to comets or asteroids in the Solar system. All natural-origin interpretations of the Oumuamua anomalies contemplated objects of a type never-seen-before, such as: a porous cloud of dust particles, a tidal disruption fragment or exotic icebergs made of pure hydrogen or pure nitrogen. Each of these natural-origin models has major quantitative shortcomings, and so the possibility of an artificial origin for `Oumuamua must be considered. The Galileo Project aims to collect new data that will identify the nature of `Oumuamua-like objects in the coming years.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
