Risk-utility tradeoff shapes memory strategies for evolving patterns
Oskar H Schnaack, Luca Peliti, and Armita Nourmohammad

TL;DR
This paper presents an energy-based framework for understanding how systems can optimally balance memory utility and risk to effectively classify evolving patterns, with implications for biological and machine learning systems.
Contribution
It introduces a novel analytical framework that models the tradeoff between utility and risk in memory systems handling dynamic stimuli, providing general guidelines for learning in evolving environments.
Findings
Moderate risk tolerance enhances memory robustness.
The framework applies to biological and machine learning systems.
Optimal memory strategies do not require fine-tuning.
Abstract
Keeping a memory of evolving stimuli is ubiquitous in biology, an example of which is immune memory for evolving pathogens. However, learning and memory storage for dynamic patterns still pose challenges in machine learning. Here, we introduce an analytical energy-based framework to address this problem. By accounting for the tradeoff between utility in keeping a high-affinity memory and the risk in forgetting some of the diverse stimuli, we show that a moderate tolerance for risk enables a repertoire to robustly classify evolving patterns, without much fine-tuning. Our approach offers a general guideline for learning and memory storage in systems interacting with diverse and evolving stimuli.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics · Evolution and Genetic Dynamics · Data Stream Mining Techniques
