From Complexity Measurement to Holistic Quality Evaluation for Automotive Software Development
Jens Heidrich, Michael Kl\"as, Andreas Morgenstern, Pablo Oliveira, Antonino, Adam Trendowicz, Jochen Quante, Thomas Grundler

TL;DR
This paper advocates for a flexible, goal-oriented framework for evaluating automotive software quality, moving beyond static complexity metrics to better suit project-specific needs.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach that systematically derives measures and evaluation rules based on project goals and context, enhancing quality assessment.
Findings
Proposes a flexible, goal-driven evaluation framework
Addresses limitations of static complexity metrics
Enhances adaptability in automotive software quality management
Abstract
In recent years, the role and the importance of software in the automotive domain have changed dramatically. Being able to systematically evaluate and manage software quality is becoming even more crucial. In practice, however, we still find a largely static approach for measuring software quality based on a predefined list of complexity metrics with static thresholds to fulfill. We propose using a more flexible framework instead, which systematically derives measures and evaluation rules based on the goals and context of a development project.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSoftware Engineering Research · Software Reliability and Analysis Research · Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
