Radio Galaxy Classification: #Tags, not Boxes
Lawrence Rudnick

TL;DR
The paper proposes a new flexible #tag-based system for classifying radio galaxies, replacing traditional box-based schemes to better accommodate their complexity and evolving understanding.
Contribution
It introduces a novel #tag system for radio galaxy classification, aiming for flexibility and consensus in a rapidly expanding field.
Findings
Proposes a #tag-based classification framework
Addresses conflicts and ambiguities in current schemes
Encourages community adoption and evolution of the system
Abstract
After six decades of studying radio galaxies, we are now being delightfully overwhelmed by their exponentially expanding numbers, and the complexity of their structures. Similarly, the ways we classify radio galaxies have exploded, often leading to conflicting terminology, ambiguous classifications, and historical schemes that may or may not match with our current physical understanding. After discussions with more than 100 radio astronomers over the last several years, listening to their ideas and aspirations, I propose that we reconceptualize the classification of radio galaxies. Instead of trying to put them into "boxes", we should assign them #tags, a system that is easy to understand and apply, flexible and evolving, and can accommodate conflicting ideas about what is relevant and important. Here, I outline the basis of such a #tag system; the rest is up to the community.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
