On the underlying drag-reduction mechanisms of flow-control strategies in a transitional channel flow: temporal approach

TL;DR

This study uses a temporal analysis of direct numerical simulations to compare how three flow-control strategies—polymers, slip surfaces, and body forces—reduce drag in transitional channel flows by altering turbulence phases.

Contribution

It reveals distinct underlying mechanisms for each control method, highlighting how polymers and slip surfaces increase hibernation frequency, while body forces prolong hibernation durations.

Findings

Polymers and slip surfaces increase hibernating phases frequency.

Body forces prolong hibernating phases through wall vortical structures.

Different mechanisms suggest tailored flow-control strategies for turbulence management.

Abstract

The underlying mechanisms of three different flow-control strategies on drag reduction in a channel flow are investigated by direct numerical simulations at friction Reynolds numbers ranging from 65 to 85. These strategies include the addition of long-chain polymers, the incorporation of slip surfaces, and the application of an external body force. While it has been believed that such methods lead to a skin-friction reduction by controlling near-wall flow structures, the underlying mechanisms at play are still not as clear. In this study, a temporal analysis is employed to elucidate underlying drag-reduction mechanisms among these methods. The analysis is based on the lifetime of intermittent phases represented by the active and hibernating phases of a minimal turbulent channel flow (Xi & Graham, Phy. Rev. Lett. 2010). At a similar amount of drag reduction, the polymer and slip methods show a similar mechanism, while the body force method is different. The polymers and slip surfaces cause hibernating phases to happen more frequently, while the duration of active phases is decreased. However, the body forces cause hibernating phases to happen less frequently but prolong its duration to achieve a comparable amount of drag reduction. A possible mechanism behind the body force method is associated with its unique roller-like vortical structures formed near the wall. These structures appear to prevent interactions between inner and outer regions by which hibernating phases are prolonged. It should motivate adaptive flow-control strategies to exploit the distinct underlying mechanisms for robust control of turbulent drag at low Reynolds numbers.