Symbolic Substitutions, Bratteli Diagrams and Operator Algebras
Dylan Gawlak, Christopher Ramsey

TL;DR
This paper explores the connections between symbolic substitutions, Bratteli diagrams, and operator algebras, analyzing how various equivalence relations affect their properties and applying these concepts to Fibonacci-like substitutions.
Contribution
It introduces new equivalence relations on substitutions via Bratteli diagrams and examines their impact on properties like pure aperiodicity and primitivity.
Findings
Telescope equivalence preserves pure aperiodicity and primitivity.
Finer equivalence relations do not preserve all invariants.
Application to Fibonacci-like substitutions demonstrates theoretical concepts.
Abstract
In this paper we look at symbolic substitutions and their relationship to Bratteli diagrams and their associated operator algebras. In particular, we consider the equivalence relation on substitutions induced by telescope equivalence of Bratteli diagrams. Such an equivalence preserves pure aperiodicity and primitivity but fails to preserve rank, order, and number of letters. In a similar manner, we consider the equivalence relation on substitutions induced by telescope equivalence of ordered Bratteli diagrams. This results in a finer equivalence but fails to provide a complete invariant. An application to Fibonacci-like substitutions is developed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Quasicrystal Structures and Properties · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
