Common-red-signal analysis with 24-yr high-precision timing of the European Pulsar Timing Array: Inferences in the stochastic gravitational-wave background search
S. Chen, R. N. Caballero, Y. J. Guo, A. Chalumeau, K.Liu, G., Shaifullah, K. J. Lee, S. Babak, G. Desvignes, A. Parthasarathy, H. Hu, E., van der Wateren, J. Antoniadis, A.-S. Bak Nielsen, C. G. Bassa, A., Berthereau, M. Burgay, D. J. Champion, I. Cognard, M. Falxa

TL;DR
This study searches for a stochastic gravitational-wave background using 24 years of pulsar timing data from the European Pulsar Timing Array, finding spectral properties consistent with predictions but no definitive detection of the Hellings-Downs correlation.
Contribution
The paper provides the first high-precision 24-year pulsar timing analysis with two independent pipelines, improving constraints on the gravitational-wave background and addressing systematic effects.
Findings
Spectral properties compatible with GWB predictions
No definitive Hellings-Downs correlation detected
Most favored model is uncorrelated red noise
Abstract
We present results from the search for a stochastic gravitational-wave background (GWB) as predicted by the theory of General Relativity using six radio millisecond pulsars from the Data Release 2 (DR2) of the European Pulsar Timing Array (EPTA) covering a timespan up to 24 years. A GWB manifests itself as a long-term low-frequency stochastic signal common to all pulsars, a common red signal (CRS), with the characteristic Hellings-Downs (HD) spatial correlation. Our analysis is performed with two independent pipelines, \eprise{} and \tn{}+\ftwo{}, which produce consistent results. A search for a CRS with simultaneous estimation of its spatial correlations yields spectral properties compatible with theoretical GWB predictions, but does not result in the required measurement of the HD correlation, as required for GWB detection. Further Bayesian model comparison between different types of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
