SciClops: Detecting and Contextualizing Scientific Claims for Assisting Manual Fact-Checking
Panayiotis Smeros, Carlos Castillo, Karl Aberer

TL;DR
SciClops is a novel method that extracts, clusters, and contextualizes scientific claims from online sources to assist manual fact-checking and combat misinformation in scientific domains.
Contribution
It introduces a three-step process leveraging domain-specific transformers and literature clustering to improve scientific claim verification.
Findings
Outperforms commercial fact-checking systems in experiments
Effectively assists non-expert fact-checkers with scientific claims
Provides enhanced context with related scientific literature
Abstract
This paper describes SciClops, a method to help combat online scientific misinformation. Although automated fact-checking methods have gained significant attention recently, they require pre-existing ground-truth evidence, which, in the scientific context, is sparse and scattered across a constantly-evolving scientific literature. Existing methods do not exploit this literature, which can effectively contextualize and combat science-related fallacies. Furthermore, these methods rarely require human intervention, which is essential for the convoluted and critical domain of scientific misinformation. SciClops involves three main steps to process scientific claims found in online news articles and social media postings: extraction, clustering, and contextualization. First, the extraction of scientific claims takes place using a domain-specific, fine-tuned transformer model. Second, similar…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
