
TL;DR
This paper improves bounds on the length of UPS-factorization in rich words, showing it grows slower than previously known, with the new bound involving an exponential of a square root of the logarithm of word length.
Contribution
The authors establish a tighter upper bound on the UPS-factorization length for rich words, refining earlier results by introducing a bound involving exponential decay with respect to the square root of the logarithm.
Findings
Improved the upper bound on UPS-factorization length from linear to sublinear growth.
Demonstrated the bound depends on the alphabet size.
Provided explicit constants for the new bound.
Abstract
A finite word is called \emph{rich} if it contains distinct palindromic factors including the empty word. For every finite rich word there are distinct nonempty palindromes such that and is the longest palindromic suffix of , where . This palindromic factorization is called \emph{UPS-factorization}. Let be \emph{the length of UPS-factorization} of . In 2017, it was proved that there is a constant such that if is a finite rich word and then . We improve this result as follows: There are constants such that if is a finite rich word and then \[luf(w)\leq \mu\frac{n}{e^{\pi\sqrt{\ln{n}}}}\mbox{.}\] The constants depend on the size of the alphabet.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
