Debiasing Credit Scoring using Evolutionary Algorithms
Nigel Kingsman

TL;DR
This paper explores the challenge of training credit scoring models that balance accuracy with multiple bias objectives, demonstrating the inherent trade-offs and difficulty in minimizing discriminatory bias while maintaining performance.
Contribution
It introduces an empirical study using evolutionary algorithms to analyze the trade-offs between bias mitigation and accuracy in credit scoring models.
Findings
Bias objectives cannot be fully satisfied simultaneously.
Trade-offs are necessary between fairness and accuracy.
Evolutionary algorithms help explore bias-accuracy trade-offs.
Abstract
This paper investigates the application of machine learning when training a credit decision model over real, publicly available data whilst accounting for "bias objectives". We use the term "bias objective" to describe the requirement that a trained model displays discriminatory bias against a given groups of individuals that doesn't exceed a prescribed level, where such level can be zero. This research presents an empirical study examining the tension between competing model training objectives which in all cases include one or more bias objectives. This work is motivated by the observation that the parties associated with creditworthiness models have requirements that can not certainly be fully met simultaneously. The research herein seeks to highlight the impracticality of satisfying all parties' objectives, demonstrating the need for "trade-offs" to be made. The results and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Private Equity and Venture Capital · Artificial Intelligence in Law
MethodsAttentive Walk-Aggregating Graph Neural Network
