Observed tidal evolution of Kleopatra's outer satellite

TL;DR

This study detects tidal evolution in Kleopatra's outer moon through combined astrometric and light curve analysis, revealing orbital and spin deceleration, and providing insights into the asteroid's internal structure.

Contribution

First detection of tidal evolution in moons orbiting a 100-km asteroid, linking historical and recent observations with a tidal dissipation model.

Findings

Observed orbital period increase of the moon due to tidal dissipation

Measured spin deceleration of Kleopatra consistent with tidal models

Predicted secular evolution of the inner moon's orbit

Abstract

The orbit of the outer satellite Alexhelios of (216) Kleopatra is already constrained by adaptive-optics astrometry, obtained with the VLT/SPHERE instrument. However, there is also a preceding occultation event in 1980 attributed to this satellite. Hereinafter, we try to link all observations, spanning 1980--2018. We find the nominal orbit exhibits an unexplained shift by $+60^\circ$ in the true longitude. Using both periodogram analysis and an $\ell = 10$ multipole model suitable for the motion of mutually interacting moons about the irregular body, we confirmed that it is not possible to adjust the respective osculating period $P_2$. Instead, we were forced to use a model with tidal dissipation (and increasing orbital periods) to explain the shift. We also analyzed light curves, spanning 1977--2021, and searched for the expected spin deceleration of Kleopatra. According to our best-fit model, the observed period rate is $\dot P_2 = (1.8\pm 0.1)\cdot 10^{-8}\,{\rm d}\,{\rm d}^{-1}$ and the corresponding time lag $\Delta t_2 = 42\,{\rm s}$ of tides, for the assumed value of the Love number $k_2 = 0.3$. It is the first detection of tidal evolution for moons orbiting 100-km asteroids. The corresponding dissipation factor $Q$ is comparable with other terrestrial bodies, albeit at a higher loading frequency $2|\omega-n|$. We also predict a secular evolution of the inner moon, $\dot P_1 = 5.0\cdot 10^{-8}$, as well as a spin deceleration of Kleopatra, $\dot P_0 = 1.9\cdot 10^{-12}$. In alternative models, with moons captured in the 3:2 mean-motion resonance or more massive moons, the respective values of $\Delta t_2$ are a factor of 2--3 lower. Future astrometric observations by direct imaging or occultations should allow to distinguish between these models, which is important for the internal structure and mechanical properties of (216) Kleopatra.