First-principles study of defect formation energies in LaO$X$S$_2$ ($X=$ Sb, Bi)
Masayuki Ochi, Kazuhiko Kuroki

TL;DR
This study uses first-principles calculations to analyze defect formation energies in LaO$X$S$_2$ ($X=$ Sb, Bi), revealing differences in defect stability and implications for structural stability between the two compounds.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of defect formation energies in LaO$X$S$_2$ ($X=$ Sb, Bi), highlighting the stability of oxygen vacancies and the influence of in-plane sulfur defects.
Findings
Oxygen vacancy is more stable in LaO$X$S$_2$ with $X=$ Bi.
In-plane sulfur vacancy is more stable in $X=$ Sb due to Sb$_2$ dimer formation.
Fluorine substitution for oxygen has negative formation energy, especially in $X=$ Sb.
Abstract
We theoretically investigate defect formation energies in LaOS (Sb, Bi) using first-principles calculation. We find that the oxygen vacancy is relatively stable, where its formation energy is higher in Sb than in Bi. An interesting feature of Sb is that the vacancy of the in-plane sulfur atom becomes more stable than in Bi, caused by the formation of an Sb dimer and the electron occupation of the impurity energy levels. The formation energies of cation defects and anion-cation antisite defects are positive for the chemical equilibrium condition used in this study. Fluorine likely replaces oxygen, and its defect formation energy is negative for both Sb and Bi, while that for Sb is much higher than Bi. Our study clarifies the stability of several point defects and suggests that the in-plane structural instability is enhanced in Sb,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
