Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotations

TL;DR

This paper introduces two real-world noisy label datasets, CIFAR-10N and CIFAR-100N, based on human annotations, to better study and benchmark learning algorithms under realistic noise conditions, highlighting the instance-dependent nature of real-world label noise.

Contribution

The work provides controllable, moderate-sized datasets with ground-truth labels for real-world noise, and benchmarks existing methods to reveal challenges posed by human label noise patterns.

Findings

Real-world noisy labels follow instance-dependent patterns.

Existing synthetic noise assumptions do not fully capture real-world noise.

Real-world noise presents unique challenges for learning algorithms.

Abstract

Existing research on learning with noisy labels mainly focuses on synthetic label noise. Synthetic noise, though has clean structures which greatly enabled statistical analyses, often fails to model real-world noise patterns. The recent literature has observed several efforts to offer real-world noisy datasets, yet the existing efforts suffer from two caveats: (1) The lack of ground-truth verification makes it hard to theoretically study the property and treatment of real-world label noise; (2) These efforts are often of large scales, which may result in unfair comparisons of robust methods within reasonable and accessible computation power. To better understand real-world label noise, it is crucial to build controllable and moderate-sized real-world noisy datasets with both ground-truth and noisy labels. This work presents two new benchmark datasets CIFAR-10N, CIFAR-100N, equipping the training datasets of CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 with human-annotated real-world noisy labels we collected from Amazon Mechanical Turk. We quantitatively and qualitatively show that real-world noisy labels follow an instance-dependent pattern rather than the classically assumed and adopted ones (e.g., class-dependent label noise). We then initiate an effort to benchmarking a subset of the existing solutions using CIFAR-10N and CIFAR-100N. We further proceed to study the memorization of correct and wrong predictions, which further illustrates the difference between human noise and class-dependent synthetic noise. We show indeed the real-world noise patterns impose new and outstanding challenges as compared to synthetic label noise. These observations require us to rethink the treatment of noisy labels, and we hope the availability of these two datasets would facilitate the development and evaluation of future learning with noisy label solutions. Datasets and leaderboards are available at http://noisylabels.com.