Numerical solutions to linear transfer problems of polarized radiation II. Krylov methods and matrix-free implementation

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that preconditioned Krylov iterative methods significantly improve the efficiency and robustness of solving large linear transfer problems of polarized radiation, especially when implemented in a matrix-free context.

Contribution

It provides a practical analysis of Krylov methods applied to polarized radiative transfer, highlighting their advantages over traditional stationary iterative methods.

Findings

Krylov methods accelerate convergence and reduce run time.

Jacobi-preconditioned Krylov methods outperform SOR-preconditioned stationary methods.

Jacobi-GMRES offers the best overall performance in the tested scenario.

Abstract

Context. Numerical solutions to transfer problems of polarized radiation in solar and stellar atmospheres commonly rely on stationary iterative methods, which often perform poorly when applied to large problems. In recent times, stationary iterative methods have been replaced by state-of-the-art preconditioned Krylov iterative methods for many applications. However, a general description and a convergence analysis of Krylov methods in the polarized radiative transfer context are still lacking. Aims. We describe the practical application of preconditioned Krylov methods to linear transfer problems of polarized radiation, possibly in a matrix-free context. The main aim is to clarify the advantages and drawbacks of various Krylov accelerators with respect to stationary iterative methods. Methods. We report the convergence rate and the run time of various Krylov-accelerated techniques combined with different formal solvers when applied to a 1D benchmark transfer problem of polarized radiation. In particular, we analyze the GMRES, BICGSTAB, and CGS Krylov methods, preconditioned with Jacobi, or (S)SOR. Results. Krylov methods accelerate the convergence, reduce the run time, and improve the robustness of standard stationary iterative methods. Jacobi-preconditioned Krylov methods outperform SOR-preconditioned stationary iterations in all respects. In particular, the Jacobi-GMRES method offers the best overall performance for the problem setting in use. Conclusions. Krylov methods can be more challenging to implement than stationary iterative methods. However, an algebraic formulation of the radiative transfer problem allows one to apply and study Krylov acceleration strategies with little effort. Furthermore, many available numerical libraries implement matrix-free Krylov routines, enabling an almost effortless transition to Krylov methods.