Degree of Satisfiability in Heyting Algebras
Benjamin Merlin Bumpus, Zoltan A. Kocsis

TL;DR
This paper studies the probability that randomly chosen elements in Heyting algebras satisfy certain logical equations, classifies equations based on their satisfiability gap, and explores implications for logic and topology.
Contribution
It classifies all one-variable equations in Heyting algebras by their finite satisfiability gap and analyzes classical principles in multi-variable contexts.
Findings
In finite non-Boolean Heyting algebras, the probability of satisfying $x \/\ eg x = \top$ is at most 2/3.
Classifies all one-variable equations in Heyting algebras by their finite satisfiability gap.
Extends results to infinite Heyting algebras with applications to topology and logic.
Abstract
Given a finite structure and property , it is a natural to study the degree of satisfiability of in ; i.e. to ask: what is the probability that uniformly randomly chosen elements in satisfy ? In group theory, a well-known result of Gustafson states that the equation has a finite satisfiability gap: its degree of satisfiability is either (in Abelian groups) or no larger than . Degree of satisfiability has proven useful in the study of (finite and infinite) group-like and ring-like algebraic structures, but finite satisfiability gap questions have not been considered in lattice-like, order-theoretic settings yet. Here we investigate degree of satisfiability questions in the context of Heyting algebras and intuitionistic logic. We classify all equations in one free variable with respect to finite satisfiability gap, and determine which common…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Advanced Topology and Set Theory · Advanced Algebra and Logic
