Taxonomy of Brane Gravity Localisations
C. W. Erickson, Rahim Leung, K. S. Stelle

TL;DR
This paper develops a detailed taxonomy of how gravity can be localized on branes within higher-dimensional theories, distinguishing between different scenarios based on boundary conditions and mode inclusion, with applications to supergravity backgrounds.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive classification of brane gravity localizations, clarifies the conditions for effective lower-dimensional gravity, and analyzes Newton constant interpretations in specific supergravity models.
Findings
Type I localization involves Kaluza-Klein truncation without true gravity localization.
Type II allows coupling to higher-dimensional sources without special boundary conditions.
Type III enables effective lower-dimensional gravity with specific boundary conditions and zero modes.
Abstract
Generating an effective theory of lower-dimensional gravity on a submanifold within an original higher-dimensional theory can be achieved even if the reduction space is non-compact. Localisation of gravity on such a lower-dimensional worldvolume can be interpreted in a number of ways. The first scenario, Type I, requires a mathematically consistent Kaluza-Klein style truncation down to a theory in the lower dimension, in which case solutions purely within that reduced theory exist. However, that situation is not a genuine localisation of gravity because all such solutions have higher-dimensional source extensions according to the Kaluza-Klein ansatz. Also, there is no meaningful notion of Newton's constant for such Type I constructions. Types II and III admit coupling to genuinely localised sources in the higher-dimensional theory, with corresponding solutions involving full sets of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
