Dust entrainment in photoevaporative winds: Densities and imaging

TL;DR

This study models dust densities in XEUV-driven photoevaporative winds from protoplanetary disks, assessing their observability in scattered and polarised light, and finds detection is challenging with current instruments.

Contribution

It provides the first detailed estimates of dust densities and synthetic imaging predictions for XEUV-driven winds, highlighting observational challenges.

Findings

Dust mass-loss rate estimated at .1 ^{-11} M_\u2297 / yr

Synthetic images show faint wind signatures, difficult to detect with current instruments

Detection of XEUV winds remains challenging with existing telescopes.

Abstract

X-ray- and EUV- (XEUV-) driven photoevaporative winds acting on protoplanetary disks around young T-Tauri stars may crucially impact disk evolution, affecting both gas and dust distributions. We constrain the dust densities in a typical XEUV-driven outflow, and determine whether these winds can be observed at $\mu\mathrm{m}$-wavelengths in scattered and polarised light. For an XEUV-driven outflow around a $M_* = 0.7\,\mathrm{M}_\odot$ T-Tauri star with $L_X = 2 \cdot 10^{30}\,\mathrm{erg/s}$, we find a dust mass-loss rate $\dot{M}_\mathrm{dust} \lesssim 4.1 \cdot 10^{-11}\,\mathrm{M_\odot / yr}$ for an optimistic estimate of dust densities in the wind (compared to $\dot{M}_\mathrm{gas} \approx 3.7 \cdot 10^{-8}\,\mathrm{M_\odot / yr}$). The synthesised scattered-light images suggest a distinct chimney structure emerging at intensities $I/I_{\max} < 10^{-4.5}$ ($10^{-3.5}$) at $\lambda_\mathrm{obs} = 1.6$ ($0.4$) $\mu\mathrm{m}$, while the features in the polarised-light images are even fainter. Observations synthesised from our model do not exhibit clear features for SPHERE IRDIS, but show a faint wind signature for JWST NIRCam under optimal conditions. In conclusion, unambiguous detections of photoevaporative XEUV winds launched from primordial disks are at least challenging with current instrumentation; this provides a possible explanation as to why disk winds are not routinely detected in scattered or polarised light.