Contrastive Active Inference
Pietro Mazzaglia, Tim Verbelen, Bart Dhoedt

TL;DR
This paper introduces a contrastive objective for active inference that improves scalability, reduces computational costs, and enhances performance in complex, image-based tasks, matching reinforcement learning in goal achievement without requiring explicit rewards.
Contribution
It proposes a novel contrastive approach for active inference that outperforms likelihood-based methods and matches reinforcement learning in complex environments.
Findings
Outperforms likelihood-based active inference in image tasks
Computationally cheaper and easier to train
Handles distractors and goal generalization effectively
Abstract
Active inference is a unifying theory for perception and action resting upon the idea that the brain maintains an internal model of the world by minimizing free energy. From a behavioral perspective, active inference agents can be seen as self-evidencing beings that act to fulfill their optimistic predictions, namely preferred outcomes or goals. In contrast, reinforcement learning requires human-designed rewards to accomplish any desired outcome. Although active inference could provide a more natural self-supervised objective for control, its applicability has been limited because of the shortcomings in scaling the approach to complex environments. In this work, we propose a contrastive objective for active inference that strongly reduces the computational burden in learning the agent's generative model and planning future actions. Our method performs notably better than…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsReinforcement Learning in Robotics · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Neural dynamics and brain function
