Comment on "Frame-dragging: meaning, myths, and misconceptions" by L. F. O. Costa and J. Nat\'ario
Alexei A. Deriglazov

TL;DR
This paper critiques the interpretation of the Sagnac effect and frame-dragging in a recent article, highlighting discrepancies with standard physics interpretations and questioning the original claims.
Contribution
It clarifies the difference between the authors' interpretation and the standard understanding of frame-dragging and the Sagnac effect, emphasizing the importance of correct theoretical application.
Findings
The authors' interpretation differs from Landau-Lifshitz standard
Questions the claim that Sagnac effect arises in fixed apparatuses
Highlights the importance of correct interpretation of frame-dragging
Abstract
I point out that the authors' interpretation of their calculations differs from the standard interpretation, described in Sect. 84 of Landau-Lifshitz book. This casts doubt on the authors' claim that Sagnac effect "arises also in apparatuses which are fixed relative to the distant stars (i.e., to asymptotically inertial frames); in this case one talks about frame-dragging".
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory · History and Developments in Astronomy · Mathematics and Applications
