A Formalisation of Abstract Argumentation in Higher-Order Logic
Alexander Steen, David Fuenmayor

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method to encode abstract argumentation frameworks into higher-order logic, enabling formal analysis, verification, and extension generation using automated reasoning tools.
Contribution
It provides a uniform formalization in higher-order logic for abstract argumentation, facilitating computer-assisted analysis and verification.
Findings
Enables formal analysis of argumentation semantics
Supports automated reasoning for extension generation
Allows verification of meta-theoretical properties
Abstract
We present an approach for representing abstract argumentation frameworks based on an encoding into classical higher-order logic. This provides a uniform framework for computer-assisted assessment of abstract argumentation frameworks using interactive and automated reasoning tools. This enables the formal analysis and verification of meta-theoretical properties as well as the flexible generation of extensions and labellings with respect to well-known argumentation semantics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Semantic Web and Ontologies
