The cross-section measurement for the $^3{\textrm H}(e,e'K^+)nn\Lambda$ reaction
K. N. Suzuki, T. Gogami, B. Pandey, K. Itabashi, S. Nagao, K. Okuyama,, S. N. Nakamura, L. Tang, D. Abrams, T. Akiyama, D. Androic, K. Aniol, C., Ayerbe Gayoso, J. Bane, S. Barcus, J. Barrow, V. Bellini, H. Bhatt, D., Bhetuwal, D. Biswas, A. Camsonne, J. Castellanos, J-P. Chen

TL;DR
This study conducted a high-sensitivity search for the hypothesized bound $nn ext{Lambda}$ hypernucleus via electron-induced reactions, setting upper limits on its production cross-section and contributing to the understanding of hypernuclear existence.
Contribution
The paper presents the first high-precision measurement of the $^3{ extrm{H}}( ext{e}, ext{e}'K^+)$ reaction cross-section, improving sensitivity and establishing upper limits for the $nn ext{Lambda}$ state.
Findings
No significant $nn ext{Lambda}$ signals observed.
Upper limits on production cross-section set at 21 and 31 nb/sr.
Results constrain theoretical models of hypernuclear states.
Abstract
The small binding energy of the hypertrition leads to predictions of non-existence of bound hypernuclei for isotriplet three-body systems such as . However, invariant mass spectroscopy at GSI has reported events that may be interpreted as the bound state. The state was sought by missing-mass spectroscopy via the reaction at Jefferson Lab's experimental Hall A. The present experiment has higher sensitivity to the -state investigation in terms of better precision by a factor of about three. The analysis shown in this article focuses on the derivation of the reaction cross-section for the reaction. Events that were detected in an acceptance, where a Monte Carlo simulation could reproduce the data well (), were analyzed to minimize the systematic uncertainty. No significant…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
