Role of Oxygen States in the Low Valence Nickelate La$_4$Ni$_3$O$_8$
Y. Shen, J. Sears, G. Fabbris, J. Li, J. Pelliciari, I. Jarrige, Xi, He, I. Bozovic, M. Mitrano, Junjie Zhang, J. F. Mitchell, A. S. Botana, V., Bisogni, M. R. Norman, S. Johnston, and M. P. M. Dean

TL;DR
This study investigates the electronic structure of low valence nickelate La$_4$Ni$_3$O$_8$ using RIXS, revealing a mixed charge-transfer/Mott-Hubbard character and significant oxygen involvement, which informs understanding of their superconductivity.
Contribution
The paper provides the first detailed experimental analysis of oxygen states in La$_4$Ni$_3$O$_8$, clarifying its electronic regime and contrasting it with cuprates.
Findings
La$_4$Ni$_3$O$_8$ exhibits mixed charge-transfer/Mott-Hubbard character.
Oxygen orbitals have significant hole occupation despite large charge-transfer energy.
Transition-metal-oxygen hopping is larger in La$_4$Ni$_3$O$_8$ than in cuprates.
Abstract
The discovery of superconductivity in square-planar low valence nickelates has ignited a vigorous debate regarding their essential electronic properties: Do these materials have appreciable oxygen charge-transfer character akin to the cuprates, or are they in a distinct Mott-Hubbard regime where oxygen plays a minimal role? Here, we resolve this question using O -edge resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS) measurements of the low valence nickelate LaNiO and a prototypical cuprate LaSrCuO (). As expected, the cuprate lies deep in the charge-transfer regime of the Zaanen-Sawatzky-Allen scheme. The nickelate, however, is not well described by either limit of the ZSA scheme and is found to be of mixed charge-transfer/Mott-Hubbard character with the Coulomb repulsion of similar size to the charge-transfer energy . Nevertheless,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
