All you need is time to generalise the Goman-Khrabrov dynamic stall model
Fatma Ayancik, Karen Mulleners

TL;DR
This paper enhances the Goman-Khrabrov dynamic stall model by replacing empirical parameters with physics-based time constants, improving its generalisability across different airfoil types, flow conditions, and motion kinematics.
Contribution
The authors introduce physics-derived time scales into the Goman-Khrabrov model, enabling broader applicability without reliance on experimental data for parameter tuning.
Findings
Time delay is independent of motion type, Reynolds number, and airfoil geometry.
Post-stall decay rate correlates with Strouhal number of vortex shedding.
Model validated across various airfoils, Reynolds numbers, and motion profiles.
Abstract
Dynamic stall on airfoils negatively impacts their aerodynamic performance and can lead to structural damage. Accurate prediction and modelling of the dynamic stall loads are crucial for a more robust design of wings and blades that operate under unsteady conditions susceptible to dynamic stall and for widening the range of operation of these lifting surfaces. Many dynamic stall models rely on empirical parameters that need to be obtained from experimental or numerical data which limits their generalisability. Here, we introduce physically derived times scales to replace the empirical parameters in the Goman-Khrabrov dynamic stall model. The physics-based time constants correspond to the dynamic stall delay and the decay rate of post-stall load fluctuations. The dynamic stall delay is largely independent of the type of the motion, the Reynolds number, and the airfoil geometry and is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
