Online False Discovery Rate Control for LORD & SAFFRON Under Positive, Local Dependence
Aaron Fisher

TL;DR
This paper extends the theoretical guarantees of online FDR control methods, specifically LORD and SAFFRON, to hold under local dependence conditions, broadening their applicability beyond independence assumptions.
Contribution
It proves that LORD and SAFFRON control the FDR under local dependence, not just independence, and characterizes the limitations of the superuniformity assumption.
Findings
FDR control under local dependence for LORD and SAFFRON
Applicable to adaptive stopping rules such as rejection count thresholds
Implications for alpha investing and other online testing procedures
Abstract
Online testing procedures assume that hypotheses are observed in sequence, and allow the significance thresholds for upcoming tests to depend on the test statistics observed so far. Some of the most popular online methods include alpha investing, LORD++ (hereafter, LORD), and SAFFRON. These three methods have been shown to provide online control of the "modified" false discovery rate (mFDR) under a condition known as conditional superuniformity. However, to our knowledge, LORD & SAFFRON have only been shown to control the traditional false discovery rate (FDR) under an independence condition on the test statistics. Our work bolsters these results by showing that SAFFRON and LORD additionally ensure online control of the FDR under a "local" form of nonnegative dependence. Further, FDR control is maintained under certain types of adaptive stopping rules, such as stopping after a certain…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Data Stream Mining Techniques
MethodsTest
