Quantum yield and charge diffusion in the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope infrared detectors
Jahmour J. Givans, Ami Choi, Anna Porredon, Jenna K. C. Freudenburg,, Christopher M. Hirata, Robert J. Hill, Christopher Bennett, Roger Foltz, Lane, Meier

TL;DR
This paper extends a formalism to include quantum yield and charge diffusion effects in infrared detectors, tests it on simulations, and applies it to Roman Space Telescope data, revealing potential shear measurement contamination.
Contribution
It introduces an expanded formalism for detector effects that incorporates quantum yield and charge diffusion, validated with simulations and applied to real Roman detector data.
Findings
Charge diffusion variances measured at 0.5 μm wavelength.
Estimated shear contamination exceeds Roman's error budget.
Charge diffusion can be mitigated through PSF fitting methods.
Abstract
The shear signal required for weak lensing analyses is small, so any detector-level effects which distort astronomical images can contaminate the inferred shear. The Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope (Roman) will fly a focal plane with 18 Teledyne H4RG-10 near infrared (IR) detector arrays; these have never been used for weak lensing and they present unique instrument calibration challenges. A pair of previous investigations (Hirata & Choi 2020; Choi & Hirata 2020) demonstrated that spatiotemporal correlations of flat fields can effectively separate the brighter-fatter effect (BFE) and interpixel capacitance (IPC). Later work (Freudenburg et al. 2020) introduced a Fourier-space treatment of these correlations which allowed the authors to expand to higher orders in BFE, IPC, and classical nonlinearity (CNL). This work expands the previous formalism to include quantum yield and charge…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
