Evolution of Mercury's Earliest Atmosphere

TL;DR

This study models Mercury's early atmosphere formed from magma ocean outgassing, quantifying atmospheric escape processes and concluding that atmospheric loss was minimal, preserving most of Mercury's initial volatile content.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive coupled interior-atmosphere model to estimate early Mercury's atmospheric escape and its limited impact on planetary composition.

Findings

Atmospheric escape was energy-limited, not diffusion-limited.

Less than 0.02% of volatiles were lost during magma ocean stage.

Escape processes only removed a small fraction of Mercury's crust.

Abstract

MESSENGER observations suggest a magma ocean formed on proto-Mercury, during which evaporation of metals and outgassing of C- and H-bearing volatiles produced an early atmosphere. Atmospheric escape subsequently occurred by plasma heating, photoevaporation, Jeans escape, and photoionization. To quantify atmospheric loss, we combine constraints on the lifetime of surficial melt, melt composition, and atmospheric composition. Consideration of two initial Mercury sizes and four magma ocean compositions determine the atmospheric speciation at a given surface temperature. A coupled interior-atmosphere model determines the cooling rate and therefore the lifetime of surficial melt. Combining the melt lifetime and escape flux calculations provide estimates for the total mass loss from early Mercury. Loss rates by Jeans escape are negligible. Plasma heating and photoionization are limited by homopause diffusion rates of $\sim10^{6}$ kg/s. Loss by photoevaporation depends on the timing of Mercury formation and assumed heating efficiency and ranges from $\sim10^{6.6}$ to $\sim10^{9.6}$ kg/s. The material for photoevaporation is sourced from below the homopause and is therefore energy-limited rather than diffusion-limited. The timescale for efficient interior-atmosphere chemical exchange is less than ten thousand years. Therefore, escape processes only account for an equivalent loss of less than 2.3 km of crust ($0.3\%$ of Mercury's mass). Accordingly, $\leq0.02\%$ of the total mass of H$_2$O and Na is lost. Therefore, cumulative loss cannot significantly modify Mercury's bulk mantle composition during the magma ocean stage. Mercury's high core:mantle ratio and volatile-rich surface may instead reflect chemical variations in its building blocks resulting from its solar-proximal accretion environment.