Individual versus Social Benefit on the Heterogeneous Networks
Zahra Babaee, Mahsa Bagherikalhor, Leila Elyasizad, Mohammad Dehghan, Niry, and G. Reza Jafari

TL;DR
This paper investigates how heterogeneity in individual benefits influences the balance between individual and social benefits in networks, revealing a phase transition and the conditions leading to different network states.
Contribution
It introduces a modified Strauss's model incorporating heterogeneous individual benefits and analyzes how this heterogeneity affects network phase transitions and structure.
Findings
Heterogeneity narrows the crumpled state region in the network.
A critical point marks a first-order phase transition between benefit dominance.
Network structure varies with the strength of social versus individual benefits.
Abstract
The focus of structural balance theory is dedicated to social benefits, while in a real network individual benefits sometimes get the importance as well. In Strauss's model, the local minima are modeled by considering an individual term besides a social one and the assumption is based on equal strength of individual benefits. The results show that the competition between two terms leads to a phase transition between individual and social benefits and there is a critical point, , that represents a first-order phase transition in the network. Concerning a real network of relations, individuals adjust the strength of their relationships based on the benefits they acquire from. Therefore, addressing heterogeneity in the individual interactions, we study a modified version of Strauss's model in which the first term represents the heterogeneous individual benefit by , and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
