TL;DR
This paper reviews and compares current community detection methods for signed networks, focusing on their effectiveness and scalability across various real-world datasets, and offers recommendations for future improvements.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art algorithms for signed graph community detection, highlighting their strengths, limitations, and scalability issues.
Findings
Spectral clustering effectiveness varies with signed graph structure
Scalability challenges identified for large, dense signed networks
Recommendations for extending current methods are proposed
Abstract
Community detection is a common task in social network analysis (SNA) with applications in a variety of fields including medicine, criminology, and business. Despite the popularity of community detection, there is no clear consensus on the most effective methodology for signed networks. In this paper, we summarize the development of community detection in signed networks and evaluate current state-of-the-art techniques on several real-world data sets. First, we give a comprehensive background of community detection in signed graphs. Next, we compare various adaptations of the Laplacian matrix in recovering ground-truth community labels via spectral clustering in small signed graph data sets. Then, we evaluate the scalability of leading algorithms on small, large, dense, and sparse real-world signed graph networks. We conclude with a discussion of our novel findings and recommendations…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
