On strategies for selection games related to countable dimension
Christopher Caruvana, Steven Clontz

TL;DR
This paper investigates strategies in specific topological selection games to better understand countable and zero-dimensional spaces, generalizing known equivalences and addressing non-separable, non-metrizable cases.
Contribution
It analyzes perfect- and limited-information strategies in selection games and generalizes Telgársky's proof to relate zero-dimensional and finite-dimensional spaces.
Findings
Characterization of countable dimension via selection games
Generalization of game equivalence for zero-dimensional spaces
Insights into non-separable, non-metrizable space properties
Abstract
Two selection games from the literature, and , are known to characterize countable dimension among certain spaces. This paper studies their perfect- and limited-information strategies, and investigates issues related to non-equivalent characterizations of zero-dimensionality for spaces that are not both separable and metrizable. To relate results on zero-dimensional and finite-dimensional spaces, a generalization of Telg\'{a}rsky's proof that the point-open and finite-open games are equivalent is demonstrated.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
