Confirmation of stimulated Hawking radiation, but not of black hole lasing
Jeff Steinhauer

TL;DR
This study confirms the observation of stimulated Hawking radiation in a Bose-Einstein condensate but clarifies that it is due to the Bogoliubov-Cherenkov-Landau mechanism, not black hole lasing, supported by experiments and simulations.
Contribution
The paper provides direct evidence of stimulated Hawking radiation and identifies the BCL mechanism as its cause, challenging previous claims of black hole lasing.
Findings
Confirmed stimulated Hawking radiation in BEC
Identified BCL mechanism as the stimulation process
Ruled out black hole lasing as the cause
Abstract
Stimulated Hawking radiation in an analogue black hole in a Bose-Einstein condensate was reported seven years ago, and it was claimed that the stimulation was of the black hole lasing variety. The study was based on observation of rapidly-growing negative-energy waves. We find that the Hawking particles are directly observable in the experimental plots, which confirms the stimulated Hawking radiation. We further verify this result with new measurements. Also, the observed Hawking particles provide a sensitive, background-free probe of the underlying mechanism of the stimulation. The experiment inspired the prediction of the Bogoliubov-Cherenkov-Landau (BCL) mechanism of stimulated Hawking radiation. By computing the Bogoliubov coefficient for Hawking radiation, we find that the stimulation was of the BCL type, rather than black-hole lasing. We further confirm the results with numerical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect · Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
