Extreme exoworlds and the extremophile paradox
Ian von Hegner

TL;DR
This paper explores the paradoxical nature of extremophiles, highlighting that while they thrive in extreme environments, they cannot originate there, impacting the search for extraterrestrial life and biosignatures.
Contribution
It introduces the extreme environment paradox, analyzing the emergence and presence of extremophiles in extraterrestrial environments and their implications for astrobiology.
Findings
Extremophiles can survive in extreme environments but cannot originate there.
Extreme environments may host chemical evolution without native life.
Non-native extremophiles could serve as chemosignatures or biosignatures.
Abstract
Extremophiles have gained prominence by providing an experimental approach to astrobiology. Extremophiles gain equal value by being part of a framework for high-level characterisation of the evolutionary mechanisms that must necessarily restrict or promote their emergence and presence on solar system bodies. Thus, extremophiles exist in extreme environments, and therein lies the paradox: extremophiles can only live in extreme environments but yet are not able to originate in such environments. Therefore, even though the range of extremophile capabilities in extreme environments is wider than that in mesophiles, the range of their emergence possibilities is still equally restricted. Therefore, even if one locates an extreme exoworld where terrestrial extremophiles could live here-and-now, it can be predicted that no extremophile analogues are present anyway. Furthermore, it is possible…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstro and Planetary Science · Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena · Planetary Science and Exploration
