Spatial curvature sensitivity to local $H_0$ from the Cepheid distance ladder
Ella Zuckerman, Luis A. Anchordoqui

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether spatial curvature can be distinguished using local $H_0$ measurements from the Cepheid distance ladder, finding that current data cannot effectively discriminate between flat and non-flat cosmological models due to sensitivity limitations.
Contribution
The study critically reexamines a proposed test for spatial curvature sensitivity to local $H_0$ measurements, demonstrating its practical limitations with current supernova data.
Findings
The $ riangle $ sensitivity required is more challenging than previously thought.
Spatial curvature remains indistinguishable from flat models given current data.
Non-flat models that address the $H_0$ tension are consistent with SN Ia residuals.
Abstract
Over the last few years, low- and high-redshift observations set off a tension in the measurement of the present-day expansion rate, . Adding to the riddle, observational data from the Planck mission point to a evidence for a closed universe, further challenging the CDM concordance model of cosmology. Recently, a direct-observational test has been proposed to discriminate effects of the spatial curvature in the cosmological model. The test is based on the fundamental distance--flux--redshift relation of the luminosity distance modulus, . We reexamine the outcomes of this test and show that achieving the required sensitivity to discriminate among cosmological models is materially far more challenging than previously thought. Armed with supernova type Ia (SN Ia) data, calibrated using Cepheid measured distances, we apply the test to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
