A quantitative comparison of physical accuracy and numerical stability of Lattice Boltzmann color gradient and pseudopotential multicomponent models for microfluidic applications
Karun P.N. Datadien, Gianluca Di Staso, Herman M.A. Wijshoff, Federico, Toschi

TL;DR
This paper compares the physical accuracy and numerical stability of Color-Gradient and Shan-Chen multicomponent Lattice Boltzmann models in microfluidic applications, highlighting CG's broader parameter range and stability at high density ratios.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive quantitative comparison of CG and SC models, introduces a novel interface repulsion force approach for CG, and demonstrates CG's suitability for complex droplet simulations.
Findings
CG model handles high density ratios ($\mathcal{O}(1000)$) effectively.
CG shows good agreement with analytical solutions for droplet oscillations.
Both models produce realistic breakup results, but SC exhibits rapid satellite droplet evaporation.
Abstract
The performances of the Color-Gradient (CG) and of the Shan-Chen (SC) multicomponent Lattice Boltzmann models are quantitatively compared side-by-side on multiple physical flow problems where breakup, coalescence and contraction of fluid ligaments are important. The flow problems are relevant to microfluidic applications, jetting of microdroplets as seen in inkjet printing, as well as emulsion dynamics. A significantly wider range of parameters is shown to be accessible for CG in terms of density-ratio, viscosity-ratio and surface tension values. Numerical stability for a high density ratio is required for simulating the drop formation process during inkjet printing which we show here to be achievable using the CG model but not using the SC model. In terms of physical accuracy, the CG model shows good agreement with analytical solutions for droplet oscillation and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
