Is the orbit of the exoplanet WASP-43b really decaying? TESS and MuSCAT2 observations confirm no detection
Z. Garai, T. Pribulla, H. Parviainen, E. Pall\'e, A. Claret, L., Szigeti, V. J. S. B\'ejar, N. Casasayas-Barris, N. Crouzet, A. Fukui, G., Chen, K. Kawauchi, P. Klagyivik, S. Kurita, N. Kusakabe, J. P. de Leon, J. H., Livingston, R. Luque, M. Mori, F. Murgas, N. Narita

TL;DR
This study uses TESS and MuSCAT2 data to analyze the orbital period of exoplanet WASP-43b, finding no evidence of orbital decay over a decade, thus confirming its orbit is stable.
Contribution
The paper provides the most precise measurement to date of WASP-43b's orbital period change, confirming no decay with new high-precision observations.
Findings
No significant orbital decay detected within measurement uncertainties.
Improved orbital parameters for WASP-43b.
Extended baseline of transit timing data over 10 years.
Abstract
Up to now, WASP-12b is the only hot Jupiter confirmed to have a decaying orbit. The case of WASP-43b is still under debate. Recent studies preferred or ruled out the orbital decay scenario, but further precise transit timing observations are needed to definitively confirm or refute the period change of WASP-43b. This possibility is given by the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) space telescope. In this work we used the available TESS data, multi-color photometry data obtained with the Multicolor Simultaneous Camera for studying Atmospheres of Transiting exoplanets 2 (MuSCAT2) and literature data to calculate the period change rate of WASP-43b and to improve its precision, and to refine the parameters of the WASP-43 planetary system. Based on the observed-minus-calculated data of 129 mid-transit times in total, covering a time baseline of about 10 years, we obtained an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
